News

| Submit CommentSubmit Comments | View CommentsView Comments(2)
The Advertiser has been leading the local debate
The Advertiser has been leading the local debate

advertisement

Academies in crisis

Carl Marsden
17/10/2007

SERIOUS concerns have been raised after  one of the organisations bidding to run an Academy school in Oldham withdrew at the 11th hour from a similar scheme in Bradford.

Edutrust pulled back from plans to provide financial backing for an Academy at Rhodesway School, Allerton.

The London-based charity is currently in talks with Oldham Council and the Church of England about giving financial backing to controversial plans to close five local secondaries – Breeze Hill, Counthill, Grange, Kaskenmoor and South Chadder-ton – and replace them with three privately-sponsored multi-faith academies.

Charities or businesses give up to £2m to an Academy in return for a say in how classrooms are run, and Edutrust’s U-turn in Bradford has prompted questions about its involvement in Oldham.

A statement from Bradford said: “After hearing the views of students, the local community, teaching professionals, elected representatives and a range of other stakeholders, and following a strategic review of Edutrust by its newly-appointed chief executive, Fred Groom, the Department of Children, Schools and Families (DCSF), Bradford Council and Edutrust have reached the conclusion not to proceed with the Academy proposal.”

Bryan Beckingham, Oldham branch secretary of the NUT, claims Bradford Council had “serious reservations about an organisation that was not equipped or prepared to answer even basic questions put by parents, students and staff at consultation meetings”.

Bradford councillor David Ward, the opposition Lib Dem education spokesman, told the Advertiser he was “unimpressed” by Edutrust’s presentations.

“They talked about giving pupils an enhanced learning experience,” he said. “I asked what they would introduce or do that was different and they could not answer. I asked where they had raised standards and brought in innovative new teaching methods and they had nothing to offer other than ‘they are committed to doing it’.

“The expression ‘very long bargepole’ comes to mind. Be very careful and scrutinise any sponsor to see what their capacity to deliver what they promise actually is.”

Edutrust says its withdrawal from Bradford was based on the recommendation of its new chief executive, Mr Groom.

He told  Edutrust trustees that the expensive 18-month-long involvement of the charity in Bradford was unlikely to deliver the desired Academy within acceptable timescales.

He added: “The trustees concurred and agreed to re-allocate Edutrust’s charitable resources to other projects, including the proposed academy in Oldham.”

Mr Groom told the Advertiser that Cllr Ward’s remarks are the “opinion of one individual” and claims that many other Bradford councillors were “strongly supportive” of Edutrust.

He said: “It is important to stress that Edutrust is approved as a multiple-Academy sponsor by the DCSF who have scrutinised all our credentials,” he said. “Edutrust is authorised to set up academies and has full government support in this.”

A spokesman for Oldham Council said it would be inappropriate to comment on Bradford, but that their experience of Edutrust is “extremely positive”.

It was stated: “We are confident that all our potential sponsors have the right qualities and experience to ensure that our youngsters will benefit from new facilities in state-of-the-art schools and receive the top class education they deserve.

“Any academies would be required to admit pupils from all faiths and backgrounds and our existing Church of England and Catholic schools would also be expanded with more places for children from other faiths.

“Academies would teach the national curriculum and be required to teach an understanding of all religious faiths and not to promote one particular faith.”

Edutrust’s board includes several prominent Muslims, including businessman Lord Amir Bhatia as chairman, but trustees also include the former Archbishop of Canterbury, Lord Carey. The group is currently in talks about becoming sponsor of 11 UK academies.

Phil Woolas MP, Oldham East and Saddleworth said: “While I support academies in principle that is dependent on the credibility of any potential sponsor.

“Any sponsor would have to satisfy both the educational and financial criteria. Nothing is more important than our children’s education.”

Click on the video window for Channel M's report on Academies ...


| Submit CommentSubmit Comments | View CommentsView Comments(2)


Most recent 2 of 2 user comments

   having watched your video report on academies I would like to point out [1] sponsors CONTROL academies they decide on the curriculum, control selection of pupils, can change staff contracts and working conditions -all staff, their own governors hold the majority on the Governing Body, [2] After the inital `honeymoon` period which is heavily publicised by Local Authorities, whereby sponsors agree to specific demands, the sponsors can `sell on` the sponsorship or change agreements at will [3] funding is still by Central Government and the local council tax payer but there is no local accountability. Once lost Local Authorities cannot reclaim academies as local community schools [4] many sponsors have not yet `paid-up` on their commitment of £2million, which can be `in kind` [5] Local Authorities and sponsors rely on the new buildings and equipment to sell the vision of academies - new build local community schools would have the same `newness` and attraction [6] the successful academies have altered their curriculum to include fewer of the standard, more recognisable GCSE subjects [7] academies spend less on SEN children and tend to have fewer of these children on their school roll. [8] if oldham did not have academies the much needed funding for new-build and reburbishment of our schools would have been deferred to one of the last `waves` of schools receiving funding. If there was any funding left then ! [9]objectors to academies do not object to the need for new schools better eqipped to bring the educaion of Oldham's children into the 21st century, they object to the total and irreversible loss of control whilst still being forced to foot the bill. They who pay the piper does NOT call the tune with academies
Bella-Donna
6/12/2007 at 22:40
   sponsors are `signed up` before the dicussions on curriculum,teaching strategies and staff contracts begin in earnest
Bella-Donna
6/12/2007 at 22:21
Have your say
 
Have your say Got an opinion you want to share?
Register now and have your comments heard.

Register now

Strike
 

Do you support council workers who have gone on strike over a below-inflation pay offer?

51%
49%

Personal Finance
 

Customers with a 'good' credit profile
Company Typical APR
FirstPlus Exclusive Rate 6.6%
Moneyback Bank 7.6%
Alliance & Leicester 7.7%
Halifax (Semi-exclusive) 7.7%
Bank of Scotland (Semi-exclusive) 7.7%
Barclaycard Personal Loan 7.8%
Barclays 8.9%
Easy Access
Provider AER*
ICESAVE
Easy Access Account
6.30%
ICICI BANK
HiSAVE Savings Account
6.16%
SAINSBURYS FINANCE
internet saver
5.50%